Hunter 33 vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison
Hunter 33
1990 Feeling 32
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hunter 33 | 1990 Feeling 32 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Feeling |
| Year | 1988–1994 | 1990–1998 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | France |
| Designer | Hunter Design Team | Philippe Harlé |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) | 9.85 m (32.3 ft) |
| LWL | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) | 8.20 m (26.9 ft) |
| Beam | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) | 3.15 m (10.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.68 m (5.5 ft) | 1.50 m (4.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs) | 4,700 kg (10,362 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) | 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 48.0 m² (517 ft²) | 40.0 m² (431 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 60 L (15.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 151 L (39.9 gal) | 120 L (31.7 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 5 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hunter 33 and 1990 Feeling 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 33 is a 1980s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The Hunter 33 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.
In terms of size, the Hunter 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The Hunter 33 is 0.21m longer than the 1990 Feeling 32. The Hunter 33 displaces approximately 1% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hunter 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hunter 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hunter 33 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the Hunter 33 and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hunter 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1990 Feeling 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hunter 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.