1988 Moody 36 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

1988 Moody 361988 Moody 36
VS
1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 Moody 361976 C&C 33
General
ManufacturerMoodyC&C Yachts
Year1988–19931976–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKCanada
DesignerBill DixonCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,800 kg (14,991 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast2,700 kg (5,952 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area54.0 m² (581 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Moody 36
15.29
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Moody 36
39.71
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Moody 36
0.74
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Moody 36
20.90
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Moody 36 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Moody 36 is a 1980s design by Moody from UK, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1988 Moody 36 was penned by Bill Dixon. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1988 Moody 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1988 Moody 36 is 0.91m longer than the 1976 C&C 33. The 1988 Moody 36 displaces approximately 50% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Moody 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.29 and 54.0 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1976 C&C 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Moody 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 39.7% for the 1988 Moody 36 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Moody 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Moody 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1976 C&C 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 Moody 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 Moody 36 · 1976 C&C 33