1988 Najad 331 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

1988 Najad 331
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 32013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 Najad 3312013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
ManufacturerNajadBeneteau
Year1988–19982013
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenFrance
DesignerJudel/VrolijkVPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL8.38 m (27.5 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.18 m (10.4 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,900 kg (10,803 lbs)3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast2,000 kg (4,409 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area43.0 m² (463 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths52
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Najad 331
15.15
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Najad 331
40.82
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Najad 331
0.75
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Najad 331
20.43
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Najad 331 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Najad 331 is a 1980s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1988 Najad 331 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the 1988 Najad 331 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.18m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is 0.04m longer than the 1988 Najad 331. The 1988 Najad 331 displaces approximately 42% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Najad 331 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.15 and 43.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Najad 331 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 40.8% for the 1988 Najad 331 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Najad 331 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Najad 331 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 Najad 331 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 Najad 331 · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3