1988 Swan 38 vs 2000 Sabre 386 — Comparison

1988 Swan 381988 Swan 38
VS
2000 Sabre 386

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 Swan 382000 Sabre 386
General
ManufacturerNautor SwanSabre
Year1988–19932000–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFinlandUSA
DesignerGerman FrersJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA11.55 m (37.9 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam3.55 m (11.6 ft)3.56 m (11.7 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)7,257 kg (15,999 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area63.2 m² (680 ft²)60.5 m² (651 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Swan 38
16.78
2000 Sabre 386
16.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Swan 38
42.42
2000 Sabre 386
40.62
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Swan 38
0.73
2000 Sabre 386
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Swan 38
21.86
2000 Sabre 386
19.37

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Swan 38 and 2000 Sabre 386 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Swan 38 is a 1980s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 2000 Sabre 386 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1988 Swan 38 was penned by German Frers. The 2000 Sabre 386 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 1988 Swan 38 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the 2000 Sabre 386 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.56m beam. The 2000 Sabre 386 is 0.03m longer than the 1988 Swan 38. The 1988 Swan 38 displaces approximately 3% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Swan 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.78 and 63.2 m² of sail area. The 2000 Sabre 386, with an SA/D of 16.40 and 60.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 Swan 38 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Swan 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 2000 Sabre 386 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 42.4% for the 1988 Swan 38 and 40.6% for the 2000 Sabre 386, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Swan 38 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 2000 Sabre 386 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Swan 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 Swan 38 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Sabre 386 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 Swan 38 · 2000 Sabre 386