1988 Swan 38 vs 2005 Contest 46CS — Comparison

1988 Swan 381988 Swan 38
VS
2005 Contest 46CS

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 Swan 382005 Contest 46CS
General
ManufacturerNautor SwanContest
Year1988–19932005–2015
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFinlandNetherlands
DesignerGerman FrersDick Zaal
Dimensions
LOA11.55 m (37.9 ft)14.10 m (46.3 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)11.60 m (38.1 ft)
Beam3.55 m (11.6 ft)4.15 m (13.6 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)13,500 kg (29,762 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area63.2 m² (680 ft²)93.0 m² (1,001 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassSteel
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP75 HP
Fuel Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)350 L (92.5 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)550 L (145.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Swan 38
16.78
2005 Contest 46CS
16.66
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Swan 38
42.42
2005 Contest 46CS
38.52
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Swan 38
0.73
2005 Contest 46CS
0.70
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Swan 38
21.86
2005 Contest 46CS
20.43

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Swan 38 and 2005 Contest 46CS represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Swan 38 is a 1980s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 2005 Contest 46CS is a 2000s offering from Contest from Netherlands. The 1988 Swan 38 was penned by German Frers. The 2005 Contest 46CS was designed by Dick Zaal.

In terms of size, the 1988 Swan 38 measures 11.55m (37.9ft) overall with a beam of 3.55m, compared to the 2005 Contest 46CS at 14.10m (46.3ft) with a 4.15m beam. The 2005 Contest 46CS is 2.55m longer than the 1988 Swan 38. The 2005 Contest 46CS displaces approximately 80% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Swan 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.78 and 63.2 m² of sail area. The 2005 Contest 46CS, with an SA/D of 16.66 and 93.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 Swan 38 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Swan 38 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 2005 Contest 46CS has a comfort ratio of 20.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.70. The ballast ratios are 42.4% for the 1988 Swan 38 and 38.5% for the 2005 Contest 46CS, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Swan 38 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 2005 Contest 46CS offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 550L water and 350L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Swan 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 Swan 38 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2005 Contest 46CS offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 Swan 38 · 2005 Contest 46CS