1989 Catalina 36 vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison

1989 Catalina 361989 Catalina 36
VS
2003 Sabre 402

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1989 Catalina 362003 Sabre 402
General
ManufacturerCatalinaSabre
Year1989–19942003–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerFrank ButlerJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)3.72 m (12.2 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,804 kg (15,000 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area56.3 m² (606 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1989 Catalina 36
15.93
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1989 Catalina 36
40.01
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1989 Catalina 36
0.77
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1989 Catalina 36
19.85
2003 Sabre 402
18.32

Detailed Comparison

The 1989 Catalina 36 and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1989 Catalina 36 is a 1980s design by Catalina from USA, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1989 Catalina 36 was penned by Frank Butler. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 1989 Catalina 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 2003 Sabre 402 is 1.22m longer than the 1989 Catalina 36. The 2003 Sabre 402 displaces approximately 20% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1989 Catalina 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.93 and 56.3 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Sabre 402 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1989 Catalina 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1989 Catalina 36 and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1989 Catalina 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1989 Catalina 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Sabre 402 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1989 Catalina 36 · 2003 Sabre 402