1989 Catalina 36 vs 2010 Elan 340 — Comparison

1989 Catalina 36 1989 Catalina 36
VS
2010 Elan 340 2010 Elan 340

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1989 Catalina 36 2010 Elan 340
General
Manufacturer Catalina Elan
Year 1989–1994 2010–2014
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Slovenia
Designer Frank Butler Rob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA 10.97 m (36.0 ft) 10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL 9.14 m (30.0 ft) 9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam 3.65 m (12.0 ft) 3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 1.83 m (6.0 ft) 1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 6,804 kg (15,000 lbs) 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) 1,750 kg (3,858 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 56.3 m² (606 ft²) 55.0 m² (592 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 22 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity 189 L (49.9 gal) 160 L (42.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1989 Catalina 36
15.93
2010 Elan 340
17.31
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1989 Catalina 36
40.01
2010 Elan 340
30.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1989 Catalina 36
0.77
2010 Elan 340
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1989 Catalina 36
19.85
2010 Elan 340
19.73

Detailed Comparison

The 1989 Catalina 36 and 2010 Elan 340 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1989 Catalina 36 is a 1980s design by Catalina from USA, while the 2010 Elan 340 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1989 Catalina 36 was penned by Frank Butler. The 2010 Elan 340 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1989 Catalina 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the 2010 Elan 340 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1989 Catalina 36 is 0.61m longer than the 2010 Elan 340. The 1989 Catalina 36 displaces approximately 17% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1989 Catalina 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.93 and 56.3 m² of sail area. The 2010 Elan 340, with an SA/D of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1989 Catalina 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2010 Elan 340 has a comfort ratio of 19.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1989 Catalina 36 and 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1989 Catalina 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2010 Elan 340 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1989 Catalina 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1989 Catalina 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS