1989 J/35 vs 1981 Nautor Swan 36 — Comparison

1989 J/35
VS
1981 Nautor Swan 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1989 J/351981 Nautor Swan 36
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsNautor Swan
Year1989–19931981–1989
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFinland
DesignerRod JohnstoneSparkman & Stephens
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.43 m (11.3 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area57.6 m² (620 ft²)54.5 m² (587 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1989 J/35
19.46
1981 Nautor Swan 36
16.15
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1989 J/35
43.48
1981 Nautor Swan 36
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1989 J/35
0.79
1981 Nautor Swan 36
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1989 J/35
16.84
1981 Nautor Swan 36
22.73

Detailed Comparison

The 1989 J/35 and 1981 Nautor Swan 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1989 J/35 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is a 1980s offering from Nautor Swan from Finland. The 1989 J/35 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 was designed by Sparkman & Stephens.

In terms of size, the 1989 J/35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.43m, compared to the 1981 Nautor Swan 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is 0.30m longer than the 1989 J/35. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 displaces approximately 22% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1989 J/35 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 19.46 and 57.6 m² of sail area. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36, with an SA/D of 16.15 and 54.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1989 J/35 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1989 J/35 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 has a comfort ratio of 22.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1989 J/35 and 42.9% for the 1981 Nautor Swan 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1989 J/35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Nautor Swan 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1989 J/35 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1989 J/35 · 1981 Nautor Swan 36