1989 J/35 vs 2014 Elan 400 — Comparison

1989 J/35
VS
2014 Elan 4002014 Elan 400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1989 J/352014 Elan 400
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsElan
Year1989–19932014–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerRod JohnstoneRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)12.07 m (39.6 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)10.50 m (34.4 ft)
Beam3.43 m (11.3 ft)3.90 m (12.8 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)8,200 kg (18,078 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area57.6 m² (620 ft²)76.0 m² (818 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1989 J/35
19.46
2014 Elan 400
18.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1989 J/35
43.48
2014 Elan 400
31.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1989 J/35
0.79
2014 Elan 400
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1989 J/35
16.84
2014 Elan 400
17.08

Detailed Comparison

The 1989 J/35 and 2014 Elan 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1989 J/35 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 2014 Elan 400 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1989 J/35 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 2014 Elan 400 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1989 J/35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.43m, compared to the 2014 Elan 400 at 12.07m (39.6ft) with a 3.90m beam. The 2014 Elan 400 is 1.40m longer than the 1989 J/35. The 2014 Elan 400 displaces approximately 57% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1989 J/35 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 19.46 and 57.6 m² of sail area. The 2014 Elan 400, with an SA/D of 18.99 and 76.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1989 J/35 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1989 J/35 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 2014 Elan 400 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1989 J/35 and 31.7% for the 2014 Elan 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1989 J/35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 2014 Elan 400 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2014 Elan 400 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1989 J/35 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2014 Elan 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1989 J/35 · 2014 Elan 400