1990 Contest 40S vs 1972 Contest 31 — Comparison

1990 Contest 40S1990 Contest 40S
VS
1972 Contest 311972 Contest 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Contest 40S1972 Contest 31
General
ManufacturerContestContest
Year1990–20001972–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsNetherlands
DesignerDick ZaalDick Zaal
Dimensions
LOA12.25 m (40.2 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL10.06 m (33.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.72 m (12.2 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,072 kg (20,000 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area68.5 m² (737 ft²)39.5 m² (425 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelSteel
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity400 L (105.7 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Contest 40S
16.00
1972 Contest 31
14.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Contest 40S
40.00
1972 Contest 31
39.99
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Contest 40S
0.71
1972 Contest 31
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Contest 40S
21.09
1972 Contest 31
23.65

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Contest 40S and 1972 Contest 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Contest 40S is a 1990s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s offering from Contest from Netherlands. The 1990 Contest 40S was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1972 Contest 31 was designed by Dick Zaal.

In terms of size, the 1990 Contest 40S measures 12.25m (40.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 1972 Contest 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1990 Contest 40S is 2.80m longer than the 1972 Contest 31. The 1990 Contest 40S displaces approximately 100% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Contest 40S has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.00 and 68.5 m² of sail area. The 1972 Contest 31, with an SA/D of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1990 Contest 40S has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Contest 40S offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1972 Contest 31 has a comfort ratio of 23.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1990 Contest 40S and 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Contest 40S provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 400L of water capacity and 250L of fuel. The 1972 Contest 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 Contest 40S has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1990 Contest 40S offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Contest 40S · 1972 Contest 31