1990 Feeling 32 vs 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 — Comparison

1990 Feeling 321990 Feeling 32
VS
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Feeling 322009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
General
ManufacturerFeelingBeneteau
Year1990–19982009–2013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceFrance
DesignerPhilippe HarléFinot-Conq
Dimensions
LOA9.85 m (32.3 ft)10.44 m (34.3 ft)
LWL8.20 m (26.9 ft)9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam3.15 m (10.3 ft)3.42 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.50 m (4.9 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)5,550 kg (12,236 lbs)
Ballast1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)1,600 kg (3,527 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.0 m² (431 ft²)51.0 m² (549 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity60 L (15.9 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Feeling 32
14.49
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
16.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Feeling 32
36.17
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
28.83
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Feeling 32
0.75
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Feeling 32
20.72
2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34
18.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Feeling 32 and 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s design by Feeling from France, while the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 is a 2000s offering from Beneteau from France. The 1990 Feeling 32 was penned by Philippe Harlé. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 was designed by Finot-Conq.

In terms of size, the 1990 Feeling 32 measures 9.85m (32.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.15m, compared to the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 at 10.44m (34.3ft) with a 3.42m beam. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 is 0.59m longer than the 1990 Feeling 32. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 displaces approximately 18% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Feeling 32 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of sail area. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34, with an SA/D of 16.53 and 51.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Feeling 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32 and 28.8% for the 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Feeling 32 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Feeling 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Feeling 32 · 2009 Beneteau Oceanis 34