1990 Island Packet 29 vs 1984 Moody 33 — Comparison

1990 Island Packet 291990 Island Packet 29
VS
1984 Moody 331984 Moody 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Island Packet 291984 Moody 33
General
ManufacturerIsland PacketMoody
Year1990–19981984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerBob JohnsonBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA8.84 m (29.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL7.47 m (24.5 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.25 m (10.7 ft)
Draft1.12 m (3.7 ft)1.40 m (4.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Ballast1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area33.5 m² (361 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity132 L (34.9 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Island Packet 29
13.84
1984 Moody 33
14.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Island Packet 29
41.18
1984 Moody 33
40.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Island Packet 29
0.78
1984 Moody 33
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Island Packet 29
21.60
1984 Moody 33
21.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Island Packet 29 and 1984 Moody 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Island Packet 29 is a 1990s design by Island Packet from USA, while the 1984 Moody 33 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The 1990 Island Packet 29 was penned by Bob Johnson. The 1984 Moody 33 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1990 Island Packet 29 measures 8.84m (29.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1984 Moody 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.25m beam. The 1984 Moody 33 is 1.22m longer than the 1990 Island Packet 29. The 1984 Moody 33 displaces approximately 35% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Island Packet 29 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 13.84 and 33.5 m² of sail area. The 1984 Moody 33, with an SA/D of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1984 Moody 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Island Packet 29 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1984 Moody 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1990 Island Packet 29 and 40.4% for the 1984 Moody 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Island Packet 29 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 132L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1984 Moody 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Island Packet 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 Moody 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 Moody 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Island Packet 29 · 1984 Moody 33