1990 J/40 vs Catalina 387 — Comparison

1990 J/40
VS
Catalina 387Catalina 387

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 J/40Catalina 387
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsCatalina
Year1990–19951996–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRod JohnstoneGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA12.30 m (40.4 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL10.21 m (33.5 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft2.08 m (6.8 ft)1.96 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)
Ballast3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area72.5 m² (780 ft²)63.0 m² (678 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 J/40
18.87
Catalina 387
16.73
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 J/40
44.12
Catalina 387
39.39
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 J/40
0.74
Catalina 387
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 J/40
17.98
Catalina 387
18.47

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 J/40 and Catalina 387 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 J/40 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Catalina 387 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1990 J/40 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Catalina 387 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1990 J/40 measures 12.30m (40.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the Catalina 387 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1990 J/40 is 0.72m longer than the Catalina 387. The 1990 J/40 displaces approximately 3% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 J/40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.87 and 72.5 m² of sail area. The Catalina 387, with an SA/D of 16.73 and 63.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1990 J/40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 J/40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The Catalina 387 has a comfort ratio of 18.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 44.1% for the 1990 J/40 and 39.4% for the Catalina 387, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 J/40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Catalina 387 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Catalina 387 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 J/40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 387 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 J/40 · Catalina 387