1990 J/40 vs Hanse 375 — Comparison

1990 J/40 1990 J/40
VS
Hanse 375 Hanse 375

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1990 J/40 Hanse 375
General
Manufacturer J/Boats Hanse
Year 1990–1995 2009–2015
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Germany
Designer Rod Johnstone judel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA 12.30 m (40.4 ft) 11.35 m (37.2 ft)
LWL 10.21 m (33.5 ft) 10.05 m (33.0 ft)
Beam 3.65 m (12.0 ft) 3.65 m (12.0 ft)
Draft 2.08 m (6.8 ft) 1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,711 kg (17,000 lbs) 7,000 kg (15,432 lbs)
Ballast 3,402 kg (7,500 lbs) 2,150 kg (4,740 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 72.5 m² (780 ft²) 62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 29 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 130 L (34.3 gal)
Water Capacity 189 L (49.9 gal) 250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 J/40
18.87
Hanse 375
17.21
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 J/40
44.12
Hanse 375
30.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 J/40
0.74
Hanse 375
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 J/40
17.98
Hanse 375
17.59

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 J/40 and Hanse 375 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 J/40 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Hanse 375 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1990 J/40 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Hanse 375 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1990 J/40 measures 12.30m (40.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the Hanse 375 at 11.35m (37.2ft) with a 3.65m beam. The 1990 J/40 is 0.95m longer than the Hanse 375. The 1990 J/40 displaces approximately 10% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 J/40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.87 and 72.5 m² of sail area. The Hanse 375, with an SA/D of 17.21 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1990 J/40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 J/40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The Hanse 375 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 44.1% for the 1990 J/40 and 30.7% for the Hanse 375, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 J/40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Hanse 375 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L water and 130L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 J/40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 J/40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS