1990 J/40 vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison

1990 J/40
VS
2013 Elan 350

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 J/402013 Elan 350
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsElan
Year1990–19952013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerRod JohnstoneRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA12.30 m (40.4 ft)10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL10.21 m (33.5 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.65 m (12.0 ft)3.46 m (11.4 ft)
Draft2.08 m (6.8 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,711 kg (17,000 lbs)6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)
Ballast3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area72.5 m² (780 ft²)58.0 m² (624 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 J/40
18.87
2013 Elan 350
17.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 J/40
44.12
2013 Elan 350
30.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 J/40
0.74
2013 Elan 350
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 J/40
17.98
2013 Elan 350
19.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 J/40 and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 J/40 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1990 J/40 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1990 J/40 measures 12.30m (40.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.65m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The 1990 J/40 is 1.63m longer than the 2013 Elan 350. The 1990 J/40 displaces approximately 26% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 J/40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.87 and 72.5 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1990 J/40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 J/40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 44.1% for the 1990 J/40 and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 J/40 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2013 Elan 350 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 J/40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 J/40 · 2013 Elan 350