1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 vs 1995 Valiant 42 — Comparison

1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
VS
1995 Valiant 42 1995 Valiant 42

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 1995 Valiant 42
General
Manufacturer Pacific Seacraft Valiant
Year 1990–2007 1995–2005
Type Cutter Cutter
Country USA USA
Designer William Crealock Bob Perry
Dimensions
LOA 10.36 m (34.0 ft) 12.80 m (42.0 ft)
LWL 8.08 m (26.5 ft) 10.52 m (34.5 ft)
Beam 3.20 m (10.5 ft) 3.82 m (12.5 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.90 m (6.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement 6,350 kg (13,999 lbs) 10,886 kg (23,999 lbs)
Ballast 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) 4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 51.5 m² (554 ft²) 78.0 m² (840 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Full Modified full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 28 HP 55 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 227 L (60.0 gal)
Water Capacity 227 L (60.0 gal) 416 L (109.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 7
Cabins 2 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
15.26
1995 Valiant 42
16.13
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
42.87
1995 Valiant 42
39.58
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
0.69
1995 Valiant 42
0.69
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Pacific Seacraft 34
26.98
1995 Valiant 42
22.35

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 and 1995 Valiant 42 represent two takes on cutter-rigged sailing. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is a 1990s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1995 Valiant 42 is a 1990s offering from Valiant from USA. The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 was penned by William Crealock. The 1995 Valiant 42 was designed by Bob Perry.

In terms of size, the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 1995 Valiant 42 at 12.80m (42.0ft) with a 3.82m beam. The 1995 Valiant 42 is 2.44m longer than the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34. The 1995 Valiant 42 displaces approximately 71% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.26 and 51.5 m² of sail area. The 1995 Valiant 42, with an SA/D of 16.13 and 78.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1995 Valiant 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 27.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The 1995 Valiant 42 has a comfort ratio of 22.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.69. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 and 39.6% for the 1995 Valiant 42, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1995 Valiant 42 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 416L water and 227L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Pacific Seacraft 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Valiant 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Valiant 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS