1990 Sabre 36 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

1990 Sabre 36 1990 Sabre 36
VS
1976 C&C 33 1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1990 Sabre 36 1976 C&C 33
General
Manufacturer Sabre C&C Yachts
Year 1990–1998 1976–1982
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Canada
Designer Roger Hewson Cuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA 10.97 m (36.0 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 9.14 m (30.0 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam 3.35 m (11.0 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.60 m (5.2 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs) 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast 2,449 kg (5,399 lbs) 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 52.5 m² (565 ft²) 42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 28 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 151 L (39.9 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Sabre 36
16.34
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Sabre 36
41.53
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Sabre 36
0.74
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Sabre 36
19.29
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Sabre 36 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Sabre 36 is a 1990s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1990 Sabre 36 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1990 Sabre 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1990 Sabre 36 is 0.91m longer than the 1976 C&C 33. The 1990 Sabre 36 displaces approximately 30% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Sabre 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.34 and 52.5 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1990 Sabre 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Sabre 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1990 Sabre 36 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Sabre 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Sabre 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 Sabre 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS