1990 Sabre 36 vs 1984 Cape Dory 33 — Comparison

1990 Sabre 361990 Sabre 36
VS
1984 Cape Dory 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1990 Sabre 361984 Cape Dory 33
General
ManufacturerSabreCape Dory
Year1990–19981984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRoger HewsonCarl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)7.92 m (26.0 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.12 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.45 m (4.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.5 m² (565 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP22 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Sabre 36
16.34
1984 Cape Dory 33
15.31
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Sabre 36
41.53
1984 Cape Dory 33
43.63
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Sabre 36
0.74
1984 Cape Dory 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Sabre 36
19.29
1984 Cape Dory 33
22.98

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Sabre 36 and 1984 Cape Dory 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1990 Sabre 36 is a 1990s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1984 Cape Dory 33 is a 1980s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 1990 Sabre 36 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 1984 Cape Dory 33 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the 1990 Sabre 36 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1984 Cape Dory 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.12m beam. The 1990 Sabre 36 is 0.91m longer than the 1984 Cape Dory 33. The 1990 Sabre 36 displaces approximately 18% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Sabre 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.34 and 52.5 m² of sail area. The 1984 Cape Dory 33, with an SA/D of 15.31 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1990 Sabre 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Sabre 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1984 Cape Dory 33 has a comfort ratio of 23.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1990 Sabre 36 and 43.6% for the 1984 Cape Dory 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Sabre 36 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1984 Cape Dory 33 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Cape Dory 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1990 Sabre 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1990 Sabre 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1990 Sabre 36 · 1984 Cape Dory 33