1990 Valiant 39 vs 2000 Valiant 50 — Comparison

1990 Valiant 39 1990 Valiant 39
VS
2000 Valiant 50 2000 Valiant 50

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1990 Valiant 39 2000 Valiant 50
General
Manufacturer Valiant Valiant
Year 1990–2000 2000–2008
Type Cutter Cutter
Country USA USA
Designer Bob Perry Bob Perry
Dimensions
LOA 11.89 m (39.0 ft) 15.24 m (50.0 ft)
LWL 9.45 m (31.0 ft) 12.50 m (41.0 ft)
Beam 3.56 m (11.7 ft) 4.35 m (14.3 ft)
Draft 1.75 m (5.7 ft) 2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 8,618 kg (18,999 lbs) 16,330 kg (36,001 lbs)
Ballast 3,447 kg (7,599 lbs) 6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 66.0 m² (710 ft²) 102.0 m² (1,098 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Modified full Modified full
Engine & Tanks
Engine 40 HP 100 HP
Fuel Capacity 170 L (44.9 gal) 340 L (89.8 gal)
Water Capacity 303 L (80.0 gal) 568 L (150.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 8
Cabins 2 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1990 Valiant 39
15.95
2000 Valiant 50
16.10
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1990 Valiant 39
40.00
2000 Valiant 50
38.89
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1990 Valiant 39
0.70
2000 Valiant 50
0.69
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1990 Valiant 39
23.54
2000 Valiant 50
19.94

Detailed Comparison

The 1990 Valiant 39 and 2000 Valiant 50 represent two takes on cutter-rigged sailing. The 1990 Valiant 39 is a 1990s design by Valiant from USA, while the 2000 Valiant 50 is a 2000s offering from Valiant from USA. The 1990 Valiant 39 was penned by Bob Perry. The 2000 Valiant 50 was designed by Bob Perry.

In terms of size, the 1990 Valiant 39 measures 11.89m (39.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.56m, compared to the 2000 Valiant 50 at 15.24m (50.0ft) with a 4.35m beam. The 2000 Valiant 50 is 3.35m longer than the 1990 Valiant 39. The 2000 Valiant 50 displaces approximately 89% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1990 Valiant 39 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.95 and 66.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Valiant 50, with an SA/D of 16.10 and 102.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2000 Valiant 50 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1990 Valiant 39 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 2000 Valiant 50 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.69. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1990 Valiant 39 and 38.9% for the 2000 Valiant 50, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1990 Valiant 39 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 170L of fuel. The 2000 Valiant 50 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 568L water and 340L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Valiant 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2000 Valiant 50 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Valiant 50 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS