Hunter 30 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison

Hunter 30Hunter 30
VS
1995 Feeling 39

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 301995 Feeling 39
General
ManufacturerHunterFeeling
Year1991–19961995–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerHunter Design TeamPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)11.80 m (38.7 ft)
LWL7.92 m (26.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.78 m (12.4 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)
Ballast1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area41.0 m² (441 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 30
16.94
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 30
41.18
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 30
0.78
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 30
19.54
1995 Feeling 39
18.21

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 30 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 30 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The Hunter 30 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the Hunter 30 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The 1995 Feeling 39 is 2.66m longer than the Hunter 30. The 1995 Feeling 39 displaces approximately 102% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 30 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.94 and 41.0 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1995 Feeling 39 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 30 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the Hunter 30 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 30 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Feeling 39 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Feeling 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 30 · 1995 Feeling 39