1991 Hunter 33.5 vs 1996 Najad 380 — Comparison

1991 Hunter 33.5
VS
1996 Najad 380

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1991 Hunter 33.51996 Najad 380
General
ManufacturerHunterNajad
Year1991–19961996–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerGlenn HendersonJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)11.55 m (37.9 ft)
LWL8.84 m (29.0 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
Beam3.51 m (11.5 ft)3.55 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.85 m (6.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)3,050 kg (6,724 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.7 m² (546 ft²)62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeShoal draftFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)260 L (68.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1991 Hunter 33.5
16.65
1996 Najad 380
16.44
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1991 Hunter 33.5
37.50
1996 Najad 380
40.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1991 Hunter 33.5
0.80
1996 Najad 380
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1991 Hunter 33.5
18.53
1996 Najad 380
20.83

Detailed Comparison

The 1991 Hunter 33.5 and 1996 Najad 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1991 Hunter 33.5 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 1991 Hunter 33.5 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1996 Najad 380 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 1991 Hunter 33.5 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 1996 Najad 380 at 11.55m (37.9ft) with a 3.55m beam. The 1996 Najad 380 is 1.49m longer than the 1991 Hunter 33.5. The 1996 Najad 380 displaces approximately 38% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1991 Hunter 33.5 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.65 and 50.7 m² of sail area. The 1996 Najad 380, with an SA/D of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1991 Hunter 33.5 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1991 Hunter 33.5 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1996 Najad 380 has a comfort ratio of 20.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the 1991 Hunter 33.5 and 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1991 Hunter 33.5 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 1996 Najad 380 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1991 Hunter 33.5 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1991 Hunter 33.5 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1991 Hunter 33.5 · 1996 Najad 380