1991 Westerly Seahawk vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

1991 Westerly Seahawk1991 Westerly Seahawk
VS
1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1991 Westerly Seahawk1983 Irwin 32
General
ManufacturerWesterlyIrwin
Year1991–19971983–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKUSA
DesignerEd DuboisTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,123 kg (13,499 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.0 m² (517 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity220 L (58.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
14.57
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
40.75
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
0.73
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
22.81
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The 1991 Westerly Seahawk and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk is a 1990s design by Westerly from UK, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk was penned by Ed Dubois. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk is 0.61m longer than the 1983 Irwin 32. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk displaces approximately 23% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.57 and 48.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.8% for the 1991 Westerly Seahawk and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 220L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1991 Westerly Seahawk is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1991 Westerly Seahawk has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1991 Westerly Seahawk offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1991 Westerly Seahawk · 1983 Irwin 32