1991 Westerly Seahawk vs 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 — Comparison

1991 Westerly Seahawk1991 Westerly Seahawk
VS
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 412012 Beneteau Oceanis 41

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1991 Westerly Seahawk2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
General
ManufacturerWesterlyBeneteau
Year1991–19972012–2016
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKFrance
DesignerEd DuboisFinot-Conq
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)12.43 m (40.8 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)10.89 m (35.7 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)3.99 m (13.1 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,123 kg (13,499 lbs)8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)
Ballast2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.0 m² (517 ft²)74.0 m² (797 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Water Capacity220 L (58.1 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths78
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
14.57
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
18.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
40.75
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
30.59
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
0.73
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1991 Westerly Seahawk
22.81
2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41
16.04

Detailed Comparison

The 1991 Westerly Seahawk and 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk is a 1990s design by Westerly from UK, while the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk was penned by Ed Dubois. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 was designed by Finot-Conq.

In terms of size, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 at 12.43m (40.8ft) with a 3.99m beam. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 is 2.07m longer than the 1991 Westerly Seahawk. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 displaces approximately 39% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.57 and 48.0 m² of sail area. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41, with an SA/D of 18.05 and 74.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 has a comfort ratio of 16.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.8% for the 1991 Westerly Seahawk and 30.6% for the 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1991 Westerly Seahawk provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 220L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 140L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1991 Westerly Seahawk is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1991 Westerly Seahawk · 2012 Beneteau Oceanis 41