Catalina 270 vs 1990 Sabre 36 — Comparison

Catalina 270Catalina 270
VS
1990 Sabre 361990 Sabre 36

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 2701990 Sabre 36
General
ManufacturerCatalinaSabre
Year1992–20021990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasRoger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA8.31 m (27.3 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL7.24 m (23.8 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam2.74 m (9.0 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.47 m (4.8 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast907 kg (2,000 lbs)2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area31.0 m² (334 ft²)52.5 m² (565 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine12 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 270
18.01
1990 Sabre 36
16.34
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 270
39.21
1990 Sabre 36
41.53
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 270
0.83
1990 Sabre 36
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 270
16.24
1990 Sabre 36
19.29

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 270 and 1990 Sabre 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 270 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1990 Sabre 36 is a 1990s offering from Sabre from USA. The Catalina 270 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1990 Sabre 36 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the Catalina 270 measures 8.31m (27.3ft) overall with a beam of 2.74m, compared to the 1990 Sabre 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1990 Sabre 36 is 2.66m longer than the Catalina 270. The 1990 Sabre 36 displaces approximately 155% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 270 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.01 and 31.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Sabre 36, with an SA/D of 16.34 and 52.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 270 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 270 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.83). The 1990 Sabre 36 has a comfort ratio of 19.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 39.2% for the Catalina 270 and 41.5% for the 1990 Sabre 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 270 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1990 Sabre 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Sabre 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 270 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1990 Sabre 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 270 · 1990 Sabre 36