Catalina 270 vs 2000 Najad 355 — Comparison

Catalina 270Catalina 270
VS
2000 Najad 355

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 2702000 Najad 355
General
ManufacturerCatalinaNajad
Year1992–20022000–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerGerry DouglasJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA8.31 m (27.3 ft)10.72 m (35.2 ft)
LWL7.24 m (23.8 ft)9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam2.74 m (9.0 ft)3.38 m (11.1 ft)
Draft1.47 m (4.8 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,313 kg (5,099 lbs)6,000 kg (13,228 lbs)
Ballast907 kg (2,000 lbs)2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area31.0 m² (334 ft²)51.0 m² (549 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine12 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)110 L (29.1 gal)
Water Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 270
18.01
2000 Najad 355
15.69
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 270
39.21
2000 Najad 355
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 270
0.83
2000 Najad 355
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 270
16.24
2000 Najad 355
20.10

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 270 and 2000 Najad 355 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 270 is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 2000 Najad 355 is a 2000s offering from Najad from Sweden. The Catalina 270 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 2000 Najad 355 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the Catalina 270 measures 8.31m (27.3ft) overall with a beam of 2.74m, compared to the 2000 Najad 355 at 10.72m (35.2ft) with a 3.38m beam. The 2000 Najad 355 is 2.41m longer than the Catalina 270. The 2000 Najad 355 displaces approximately 159% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 270 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.01 and 31.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Najad 355, with an SA/D of 15.69 and 51.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 270 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 270 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.83). The 2000 Najad 355 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 39.2% for the Catalina 270 and 40.0% for the 2000 Najad 355, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 270 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 2000 Najad 355 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 110L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Najad 355 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 270 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Najad 355 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 270 · 2000 Najad 355