1992 Contest 42 vs 1996 Najad 380 — Comparison

1992 Contest 421992 Contest 42
VS
1996 Najad 380

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1992 Contest 421996 Najad 380
General
ManufacturerContestNajad
Year1992–20021996–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsSweden
DesignerDick ZaalJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)11.55 m (37.9 ft)
LWL10.36 m (34.0 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
Beam3.86 m (12.7 ft)3.55 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.85 m (6.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement10,400 kg (22,928 lbs)7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)
Ballast4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)3,050 kg (6,724 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area76.0 m² (818 ft²)62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity400 L (105.7 gal)260 L (68.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1992 Contest 42
16.20
1996 Najad 380
16.44
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1992 Contest 42
40.38
1996 Najad 380
40.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1992 Contest 42
0.71
1996 Najad 380
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1992 Contest 42
21.49
1996 Najad 380
20.83

Detailed Comparison

The 1992 Contest 42 and 1996 Najad 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1992 Contest 42 is a 1990s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 1992 Contest 42 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1996 Najad 380 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 1992 Contest 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the 1996 Najad 380 at 11.55m (37.9ft) with a 3.55m beam. The 1992 Contest 42 is 1.25m longer than the 1996 Najad 380. The 1992 Contest 42 displaces approximately 39% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1992 Contest 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.20 and 76.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 Najad 380, with an SA/D of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1996 Najad 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1992 Contest 42 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1996 Najad 380 has a comfort ratio of 20.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1992 Contest 42 and 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1992 Contest 42 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 400L of water capacity and 250L of fuel. The 1996 Najad 380 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1992 Contest 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1996 Najad 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1992 Contest 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1992 Contest 42 · 1996 Najad 380