Hunter 27 vs 2015 ClubSwan 36 — Comparison
Hunter 27
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hunter 27 | 2015 ClubSwan 36 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Nautor Swan |
| Year | 1992–1998 | 2015 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Finland |
| Designer | Hunter Design Team | Juan Kouyoumdjian |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) | 11.00 m (36.1 ft) |
| LWL | 7.32 m (24.0 ft) | 9.90 m (32.5 ft) |
| Beam | 2.79 m (9.2 ft) | 3.30 m (10.8 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 2.30 m (7.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) | 4,800 kg (10,582 lbs) |
| Ballast | 907 kg (2,000 lbs) | 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 33.0 m² (355 ft²) | 65.0 m² (700 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 12 HP | 15 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 45 L (11.9 gal) | 40 L (10.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 68 L (18.0 gal) | 60 L (15.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 4 |
| Cabins | 1 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hunter 27 and 2015 ClubSwan 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 27 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2015 ClubSwan 36 is a modern offering from Nautor Swan from Finland. The Hunter 27 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 was designed by Juan Kouyoumdjian.
In terms of size, the Hunter 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.79m, compared to the 2015 ClubSwan 36 at 11.00m (36.1ft) with a 3.30m beam. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 is 2.77m longer than the Hunter 27. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 displaces approximately 92% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hunter 27 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.23 and 33.0 m² of sail area. The 2015 ClubSwan 36, with an SA/D of 23.21 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hunter 27 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has a comfort ratio of 14.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 36.4% for the Hunter 27 and 35.4% for the 2015 ClubSwan 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hunter 27 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 60L water and 40L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Hunter 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hunter 27 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hunter 27 · 2015 ClubSwan 36