1992 J/32 vs 1972 Contest 31 — Comparison

1992 J/32
VS
1972 Contest 311972 Contest 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1992 J/321972 Contest 31
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsContest
Year1992–19971972–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSANetherlands
DesignerRod JohnstoneDick Zaal
Dimensions
LOA9.91 m (32.5 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL8.38 m (27.5 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.13 m (10.3 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.4 m² (521 ft²)39.5 m² (425 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassSteel
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1992 J/32
20.00
1972 Contest 31
14.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1992 J/32
43.52
1972 Contest 31
39.99
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1992 J/32
0.80
1972 Contest 31
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1992 J/32
16.59
1972 Contest 31
23.65

Detailed Comparison

The 1992 J/32 and 1972 Contest 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1992 J/32 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s offering from Contest from Netherlands. The 1992 J/32 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 1972 Contest 31 was designed by Dick Zaal.

In terms of size, the 1992 J/32 measures 9.91m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the 1972 Contest 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1992 J/32 is 0.46m longer than the 1972 Contest 31. The 1972 Contest 31 displaces approximately 18% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1992 J/32 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 20.00 and 48.4 m² of sail area. The 1972 Contest 31, with an SA/D of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1992 J/32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1992 J/32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1972 Contest 31 has a comfort ratio of 23.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1992 J/32 and 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1992 J/32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1972 Contest 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1992 J/32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1992 J/32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1992 J/32 · 1972 Contest 31