1992 J/32 vs 1974 Morgan 33 — Comparison

1992 J/32 1992 J/32
VS
1974 Morgan 33 1974 Morgan 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1992 J/32 1974 Morgan 33
General
Manufacturer J/Boats Morgan
Year 1992–1997 1974–1980
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Rod Johnstone Charlie Morgan
Dimensions
LOA 9.91 m (32.5 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 8.38 m (27.5 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam 3.13 m (10.3 ft) 3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft 1.83 m (6.0 ft) 1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) 5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)
Ballast 1,678 kg (3,699 lbs) 2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 48.4 m² (521 ft²) 42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity 76 L (20.1 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1992 J/32
20.00
1974 Morgan 33
14.19
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1992 J/32
43.52
1974 Morgan 33
39.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1992 J/32
0.80
1974 Morgan 33
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1992 J/32
16.59
1974 Morgan 33
22.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1992 J/32 and 1974 Morgan 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1992 J/32 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1974 Morgan 33 is a 1970s offering from Morgan from USA. The 1992 J/32 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 1974 Morgan 33 was designed by Charlie Morgan.

In terms of size, the 1992 J/32 measures 9.91m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the 1974 Morgan 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1974 Morgan 33 is 0.15m longer than the 1992 J/32. The 1974 Morgan 33 displaces approximately 35% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1992 J/32 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 20.00 and 48.4 m² of sail area. The 1974 Morgan 33, with an SA/D of 14.19 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1992 J/32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1992 J/32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1974 Morgan 33 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1992 J/32 and 39.1% for the 1974 Morgan 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1992 J/32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1974 Morgan 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1974 Morgan 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1992 J/32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS