1992 J/32 vs 2001 Tartan 4100 — Comparison

1992 J/32
VS
2001 Tartan 4100

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1992 J/322001 Tartan 4100
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsTartan
Year1992–19972001–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRod JohnstoneTim Jackett
Dimensions
LOA9.91 m (32.5 ft)12.50 m (41.0 ft)
LWL8.38 m (27.5 ft)10.67 m (35.0 ft)
Beam3.13 m (10.3 ft)3.96 m (13.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)2.13 m (7.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.4 m² (521 ft²)75.0 m² (807 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)340 L (89.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1992 J/32
20.00
2001 Tartan 4100
16.96
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1992 J/32
43.52
2001 Tartan 4100
40.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1992 J/32
0.80
2001 Tartan 4100
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1992 J/32
16.59
2001 Tartan 4100
18.59

Detailed Comparison

The 1992 J/32 and 2001 Tartan 4100 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1992 J/32 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 2001 Tartan 4100 is a 2000s offering from Tartan from USA. The 1992 J/32 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 2001 Tartan 4100 was designed by Tim Jackett.

In terms of size, the 1992 J/32 measures 9.91m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the 2001 Tartan 4100 at 12.50m (41.0ft) with a 3.96m beam. The 2001 Tartan 4100 is 2.59m longer than the 1992 J/32. The 2001 Tartan 4100 displaces approximately 147% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1992 J/32 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 20.00 and 48.4 m² of sail area. The 2001 Tartan 4100, with an SA/D of 16.96 and 75.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1992 J/32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1992 J/32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 2001 Tartan 4100 has a comfort ratio of 18.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1992 J/32 and 40.5% for the 2001 Tartan 4100, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1992 J/32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 2001 Tartan 4100 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 340L water and 170L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2001 Tartan 4100 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1992 J/32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2001 Tartan 4100 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1992 J/32 · 2001 Tartan 4100