1992 J/32 vs 2007 Elan 310 — Comparison

1992 J/32
VS
2007 Elan 310

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1992 J/322007 Elan 310
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsElan
Year1992–19972007–2012
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerRod JohnstoneRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA9.91 m (32.5 ft)9.34 m (30.6 ft)
LWL8.38 m (27.5 ft)8.10 m (26.6 ft)
Beam3.13 m (10.3 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.85 m (6.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)1,300 kg (2,866 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.4 m² (521 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1992 J/32
20.00
2007 Elan 310
15.66
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1992 J/32
43.52
2007 Elan 310
28.89
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1992 J/32
0.80
2007 Elan 310
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1992 J/32
16.59
2007 Elan 310
21.35

Detailed Comparison

The 1992 J/32 and 2007 Elan 310 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1992 J/32 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 2007 Elan 310 is a 2000s offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1992 J/32 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 2007 Elan 310 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1992 J/32 measures 9.91m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.13m, compared to the 2007 Elan 310 at 9.34m (30.6ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1992 J/32 is 0.57m longer than the 2007 Elan 310. The 2007 Elan 310 displaces approximately 17% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1992 J/32 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 20.00 and 48.4 m² of sail area. The 2007 Elan 310, with an SA/D of 15.66 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1992 J/32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1992 J/32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 2007 Elan 310 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1992 J/32 and 28.9% for the 2007 Elan 310, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1992 J/32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 2007 Elan 310 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2007 Elan 310 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1992 J/32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1992 J/32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1992 J/32 · 2007 Elan 310