1992 Wauquiez Amphitrite 43 vs 1981 Pearson 424 — Comparison

1992 Wauquiez Amphitrite 43 1992 Wauquiez Amphitrite 43
VS
1981 Pearson 424 1981 Pearson 424

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1992 Wauquiez Amphitrite 43 1981 Pearson 424
General
Manufacturer Wauquiez Pearson
Year 1992–2000 1981–1985
Type Ketch Ketch
Country France USA
Designer Jean-Marie Finot William Shaw
Dimensions
LOA 13.11 m (43.0 ft) 12.80 m (42.0 ft)
LWL 10.67 m (35.0 ft) 10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam 3.96 m (13.0 ft) 3.81 m (12.5 ft)
Draft 1.98 m (6.5 ft) 1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 11,793 kg (25,999 lbs) 9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)
Ballast 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs) 3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 82.0 m² (883 ft²) 72.0 m² (775 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 55 HP 50 HP
Fuel Capacity 250 L (66.0 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity 450 L (118.9 gal) 340 L (89.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 7
Cabins 3 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1992 Wauquiez Amphitrite 43
16.08
1981 Pearson 424
16.28
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1992 Wauquiez Amphitrite 43
40.39
1981 Pearson 424
38.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1992 Wauquiez Amphitrite 43
0.70
1981 Pearson 424
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1992 Wauquiez Amphitrite 43
22.29
1981 Pearson 424
20.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1992 Wauquiez Amphitrite 43 and 1981 Pearson 424 represent two takes on ketch-rigged sailing. The 1992 Wauquiez Amphitrite 43 is a 1990s design by Wauquiez from France, while the 1981 Pearson 424 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1992 Wauquiez Amphitrite 43 was penned by Jean-Marie Finot. The 1981 Pearson 424 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1992 Wauquiez Amphitrite 43 measures 13.11m (43.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 1981 Pearson 424 at 12.80m (42.0ft) with a 3.81m beam. The 1992 Wauquiez Amphitrite 43 is 0.31m longer than the 1981 Pearson 424. The 1992 Wauquiez Amphitrite 43 displaces approximately 24% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1992 Wauquiez Amphitrite 43 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.08 and 82.0 m² of sail area. The 1981 Pearson 424, with an SA/D of 16.28 and 72.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1981 Pearson 424 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1992 Wauquiez Amphitrite 43 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 1981 Pearson 424 has a comfort ratio of 20.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 40.4% for the 1992 Wauquiez Amphitrite 43 and 38.1% for the 1981 Pearson 424, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1992 Wauquiez Amphitrite 43 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 450L of water capacity and 250L of fuel. The 1981 Pearson 424 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 340L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1992 Wauquiez Amphitrite 43 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1981 Pearson 424 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS