1993 Hunter 376 vs 2010 Elan 340 — Comparison

1993 Hunter 376 1993 Hunter 376
VS
2010 Elan 340 2010 Elan 340

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1993 Hunter 376 2010 Elan 340
General
Manufacturer Hunter Elan
Year 1993–1997 2010–2014
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Slovenia
Designer Glenn Henderson Rob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA 11.28 m (37.0 ft) 10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL 9.75 m (32.0 ft) 9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam 3.72 m (12.2 ft) 3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs) 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) 1,750 kg (3,858 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 58.9 m² (634 ft²) 55.0 m² (592 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 28 HP 21 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity 189 L (49.9 gal) 160 L (42.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1993 Hunter 376
15.96
2010 Elan 340
17.31
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1993 Hunter 376
37.51
2010 Elan 340
30.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1993 Hunter 376
0.77
2010 Elan 340
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1993 Hunter 376
18.59
2010 Elan 340
19.73

Detailed Comparison

The 1993 Hunter 376 and 2010 Elan 340 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1993 Hunter 376 is a 1990s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2010 Elan 340 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1993 Hunter 376 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2010 Elan 340 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1993 Hunter 376 measures 11.28m (37.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 2010 Elan 340 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1993 Hunter 376 is 0.92m longer than the 2010 Elan 340. The 1993 Hunter 376 displaces approximately 25% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1993 Hunter 376 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.96 and 58.9 m² of sail area. The 2010 Elan 340, with an SA/D of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1993 Hunter 376 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2010 Elan 340 has a comfort ratio of 19.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the 1993 Hunter 376 and 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1993 Hunter 376 provides 8 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2010 Elan 340 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 Elan 340 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1993 Hunter 376 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS