1993 Najad 360 vs 1996 Moody 45 — Comparison

1993 Najad 3601993 Najad 360
VS
1996 Moody 451996 Moody 45

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1993 Najad 3601996 Moody 45
General
ManufacturerNajadMoody
Year1993–20021996–2002
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUK
DesignerJudel/VrolijkBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)13.72 m (45.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)11.50 m (37.7 ft)
Beam3.42 m (11.2 ft)4.22 m (13.8 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,500 kg (14,330 lbs)12,500 kg (27,558 lbs)
Ballast2,700 kg (5,952 lbs)4,900 kg (10,803 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area55.0 m² (592 ft²)85.0 m² (915 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)450 L (118.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths68
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1993 Najad 360
16.04
1996 Moody 45
16.03
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1993 Najad 360
41.54
1996 Moody 45
39.20
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1993 Najad 360
0.73
1996 Moody 45
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1993 Najad 360
20.68
1996 Moody 45
19.06

Detailed Comparison

The 1993 Najad 360 and 1996 Moody 45 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1993 Najad 360 is a 1990s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1996 Moody 45 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 1993 Najad 360 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1996 Moody 45 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1993 Najad 360 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.42m, compared to the 1996 Moody 45 at 13.72m (45.0ft) with a 4.22m beam. The 1996 Moody 45 is 2.75m longer than the 1993 Najad 360. The 1996 Moody 45 displaces approximately 92% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1993 Najad 360 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.04 and 55.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 Moody 45, with an SA/D of 16.03 and 85.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1993 Najad 360 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1993 Najad 360 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 1996 Moody 45 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1993 Najad 360 and 39.2% for the 1996 Moody 45, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1993 Najad 360 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1996 Moody 45 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 450L water and 250L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1993 Najad 360 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1993 Najad 360 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1996 Moody 45 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1993 Najad 360 · 1996 Moody 45