1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
VS
1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 Hallberg-Rassy 291976 C&C 33
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyC&C Yachts
Year1994–20031976–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenCanada
DesignerOlle EnderleinCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA8.85 m (29.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL7.70 m (25.3 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.02 m (9.9 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.50 m (4.9 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,700 kg (8,157 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area38.0 m² (409 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity60 L (15.9 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
16.14
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
40.54
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
0.78
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
20.16
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is a 1990s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 was penned by Olle Enderlein. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 measures 8.85m (29.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.02m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1976 C&C 33 is 1.21m longer than the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29. The 1976 C&C 33 displaces approximately 23% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.14 and 38.0 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1976 C&C 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 · 1976 C&C 33