1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 vs 1984 Moody 33 — Comparison

1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
VS
1984 Moody 331984 Moody 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 Hallberg-Rassy 291984 Moody 33
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyMoody
Year1994–20031984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUK
DesignerOlle EnderleinBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA8.85 m (29.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL7.70 m (25.3 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.02 m (9.9 ft)3.25 m (10.7 ft)
Draft1.50 m (4.9 ft)1.40 m (4.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,700 kg (8,157 lbs)5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Ballast1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area38.0 m² (409 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity60 L (15.9 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
16.14
1984 Moody 33
14.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
40.54
1984 Moody 33
40.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
0.78
1984 Moody 33
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
20.16
1984 Moody 33
21.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 and 1984 Moody 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is a 1990s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1984 Moody 33 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 was penned by Olle Enderlein. The 1984 Moody 33 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 measures 8.85m (29.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.02m, compared to the 1984 Moody 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.25m beam. The 1984 Moody 33 is 1.21m longer than the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29. The 1984 Moody 33 displaces approximately 41% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.14 and 38.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Moody 33, with an SA/D of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1984 Moody 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 and 40.4% for the 1984 Moody 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 1984 Moody 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Moody 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 Moody 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 · 1984 Moody 33