1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 vs 2000 Najad 355 — Comparison

1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
VS
2000 Najad 355

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 Hallberg-Rassy 292000 Najad 355
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyNajad
Year1994–20032000–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenSweden
DesignerOlle EnderleinJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA8.85 m (29.0 ft)10.72 m (35.2 ft)
LWL7.70 m (25.3 ft)9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam3.02 m (9.9 ft)3.38 m (11.1 ft)
Draft1.50 m (4.9 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,700 kg (8,157 lbs)6,000 kg (13,228 lbs)
Ballast1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area38.0 m² (409 ft²)51.0 m² (549 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity60 L (15.9 gal)110 L (29.1 gal)
Water Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
16.14
2000 Najad 355
15.69
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
40.54
2000 Najad 355
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
0.78
2000 Najad 355
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
20.16
2000 Najad 355
20.10

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 and 2000 Najad 355 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is a 1990s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 2000 Najad 355 is a 2000s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 was penned by Olle Enderlein. The 2000 Najad 355 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 measures 8.85m (29.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.02m, compared to the 2000 Najad 355 at 10.72m (35.2ft) with a 3.38m beam. The 2000 Najad 355 is 1.87m longer than the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29. The 2000 Najad 355 displaces approximately 62% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.14 and 38.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Najad 355, with an SA/D of 15.69 and 51.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 2000 Najad 355 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 and 40.0% for the 2000 Najad 355, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L of water capacity and 60L of fuel. The 2000 Najad 355 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 110L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2000 Najad 355 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 · 2000 Najad 355