1994 Hylas 42 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

1994 Hylas 42
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 32013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 Hylas 422013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
ManufacturerHylasBeneteau
Year1994–20042013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryTaiwanFrance
DesignerGerman FrersVPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL10.52 m (34.5 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.86 m (12.7 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,525 kg (20,999 lbs)3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area74.3 m² (800 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity379 L (100.1 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths72
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Hylas 42
16.80
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Hylas 42
40.48
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Hylas 42
0.73
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Hylas 42
19.29
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Hylas 42 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Hylas 42 is a 1990s design by Hylas from Taiwan, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1994 Hylas 42 was penned by German Frers. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the 1994 Hylas 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.86m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1994 Hylas 42 is 2.70m longer than the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3. The 1994 Hylas 42 displaces approximately 176% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Hylas 42 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.80 and 74.3 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Hylas 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.73). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 40.5% for the 1994 Hylas 42 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Hylas 42 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 379L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1994 Hylas 42 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1994 Hylas 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 Hylas 42 · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3