1994 J/105 vs 1988 Moody 36 — Comparison

1994 J/105
VS
1988 Moody 361988 Moody 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 J/1051988 Moody 36
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsMoody
Year1994–20081988–1993
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerRod JohnstoneBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA10.52 m (34.5 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL8.97 m (29.4 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.51 m (11.5 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)6,800 kg (14,991 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)2,700 kg (5,952 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area57.6 m² (620 ft²)54.0 m² (581 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 J/105
23.80
1988 Moody 36
15.29
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 J/105
43.52
1988 Moody 36
39.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 J/105
0.84
1988 Moody 36
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 J/105
13.68
1988 Moody 36
20.90

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 J/105 and 1988 Moody 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 J/105 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1988 Moody 36 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The 1994 J/105 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 1988 Moody 36 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1994 J/105 measures 10.52m (34.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1988 Moody 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.51m beam. The 1988 Moody 36 is 0.45m longer than the 1994 J/105. The 1988 Moody 36 displaces approximately 76% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 J/105 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 23.80 and 57.6 m² of sail area. The 1988 Moody 36, with an SA/D of 15.29 and 54.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1994 J/105 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 J/105 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 13.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.84). The 1988 Moody 36 has a comfort ratio of 20.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1994 J/105 and 39.7% for the 1988 Moody 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 J/105 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1988 Moody 36 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Moody 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 J/105 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 Moody 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 J/105 · 1988 Moody 36