1994 J/105 vs Catalina 28 — Comparison

1994 J/105 1994 J/105
VS
Catalina 28 Catalina 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1994 J/105 Catalina 28
General
Manufacturer J/Boats Catalina
Year 1994–2008 1998–2004
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Rod Johnstone Gerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA 10.52 m (34.5 ft) 8.69 m (28.5 ft)
LWL 8.97 m (29.4 ft) 7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam 3.28 m (10.8 ft) 2.90 m (9.5 ft)
Draft 1.98 m (6.5 ft) 1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) 2,812 kg (6,199 lbs)
Ballast 1,678 kg (3,699 lbs) 1,134 kg (2,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 57.6 m² (620 ft²) 33.5 m² (361 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 38 L (10.0 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity 57 L (15.1 gal) 95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 J/105
23.80
Catalina 28
17.09
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 J/105
43.52
Catalina 28
40.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 J/105
0.84
Catalina 28
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 J/105
13.68
Catalina 28
16.59

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 J/105 and Catalina 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 J/105 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Catalina 28 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1994 J/105 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Catalina 28 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1994 J/105 measures 10.52m (34.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Catalina 28 at 8.69m (28.5ft) with a 2.90m beam. The 1994 J/105 is 1.83m longer than the Catalina 28. The 1994 J/105 displaces approximately 37% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 J/105 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 23.80 and 57.6 m² of sail area. The Catalina 28, with an SA/D of 17.09 and 33.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1994 J/105 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 J/105 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 13.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.84). The Catalina 28 has a comfort ratio of 16.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1994 J/105 and 40.3% for the Catalina 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 J/105 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Catalina 28 offers 6 berths in 1 cabin with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Catalina 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 J/105 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS