1994 J/105 vs Hanse 320 — Comparison

1994 J/105
VS
Hanse 320Hanse 320

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 J/105Hanse 320
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsHanse
Year1994–20082005–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerRod Johnstonejudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA10.52 m (34.5 ft)9.92 m (32.5 ft)
LWL8.97 m (29.4 ft)8.80 m (28.9 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.28 m (10.8 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area57.6 m² (620 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)90 L (23.8 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 J/105
23.80
Hanse 320
16.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 J/105
43.52
Hanse 320
30.43
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 J/105
0.84
Hanse 320
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 J/105
13.68
Hanse 320
17.40

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 J/105 and Hanse 320 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 J/105 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Hanse 320 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1994 J/105 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Hanse 320 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1994 J/105 measures 10.52m (34.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Hanse 320 at 9.92m (32.5ft) with a 3.28m beam. The 1994 J/105 is 0.60m longer than the Hanse 320. The Hanse 320 displaces approximately 19% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 J/105 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 23.80 and 57.6 m² of sail area. The Hanse 320, with an SA/D of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1994 J/105 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 J/105 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 13.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.84). The Hanse 320 has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1994 J/105 and 30.4% for the Hanse 320, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 J/105 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Hanse 320 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 90L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hanse 320 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 J/105 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 J/105 · Hanse 320