1994 J/105 vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison

1994 J/105
VS
2013 Elan 350

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 J/1052013 Elan 350
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsElan
Year1994–20082013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerRod JohnstoneRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA10.52 m (34.5 ft)10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL8.97 m (29.4 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.46 m (11.4 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area57.6 m² (620 ft²)58.0 m² (624 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 J/105
23.80
2013 Elan 350
17.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 J/105
43.52
2013 Elan 350
30.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 J/105
0.84
2013 Elan 350
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 J/105
13.68
2013 Elan 350
19.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 J/105 and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 J/105 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1994 J/105 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1994 J/105 measures 10.52m (34.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The 2013 Elan 350 is 0.15m longer than the 1994 J/105. The 2013 Elan 350 displaces approximately 58% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 J/105 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 23.80 and 57.6 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1994 J/105 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 J/105 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 13.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.84). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1994 J/105 and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 J/105 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2013 Elan 350 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 J/105 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 J/105 · 2013 Elan 350