1994 Sabre 362 vs 1976 Ericson 29 — Comparison

1994 Sabre 362
VS
1976 Ericson 291976 Ericson 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1994 Sabre 3621976 Ericson 29
General
ManufacturerSabreEricson
Year1994–20011976–1983
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerJim TaylorBruce King
Dimensions
LOA10.97 m (36.0 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL9.45 m (31.0 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.65 m (5.4 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,124 kg (13,501 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast2,540 kg (5,600 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area54.0 m² (581 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine28 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity170 L (44.9 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Sabre 362
16.39
1976 Ericson 29
15.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Sabre 362
41.48
1976 Ericson 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Sabre 362
0.74
1976 Ericson 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Sabre 362
18.79
1976 Ericson 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Sabre 362 and 1976 Ericson 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Sabre 362 is a 1990s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1976 Ericson 29 is a 1970s offering from Ericson from USA. The 1994 Sabre 362 was penned by Jim Taylor. The 1976 Ericson 29 was designed by Bruce King.

In terms of size, the 1994 Sabre 362 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1976 Ericson 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1994 Sabre 362 is 2.13m longer than the 1976 Ericson 29. The 1994 Sabre 362 displaces approximately 93% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Sabre 362 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.39 and 54.0 m² of sail area. The 1976 Ericson 29, with an SA/D of 15.99 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1994 Sabre 362 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Sabre 362 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1976 Ericson 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1994 Sabre 362 and 42.9% for the 1976 Ericson 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Sabre 362 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 1976 Ericson 29 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1976 Ericson 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 Sabre 362 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1994 Sabre 362 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1994 Sabre 362 · 1976 Ericson 29