1994 Sabre 362 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

1994 Sabre 362 1994 Sabre 362
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort 1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1994 Sabre 362 1982 Westerly Konsort
General
Manufacturer Sabre Westerly
Year 1994–2001 1982–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA UK
Designer Jim Taylor Ed Dubois
Dimensions
LOA 10.97 m (36.0 ft) 9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL 9.45 m (31.0 ft) 7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam 3.40 m (11.2 ft) 3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft 1.65 m (5.4 ft) 1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 6,124 kg (13,501 lbs) 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast 2,540 kg (5,600 lbs) 1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 54.0 m² (581 ft²) 34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Bilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine 28 HP 15 HP
Fuel Capacity 95 L (25.1 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity 170 L (44.9 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1994 Sabre 362
16.39
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1994 Sabre 362
41.48
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1994 Sabre 362
0.74
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1994 Sabre 362
18.79
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1994 Sabre 362 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1994 Sabre 362 is a 1990s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1994 Sabre 362 was penned by Jim Taylor. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1994 Sabre 362 measures 10.97m (36.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1994 Sabre 362 is 1.47m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The 1994 Sabre 362 displaces approximately 35% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1994 Sabre 362 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.39 and 54.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1994 Sabre 362 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1994 Sabre 362 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1994 Sabre 362 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1994 Sabre 362 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L of water capacity and 95L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 Sabre 362 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS