1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

1995 Beneteau Oceanis 3211995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 32013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1995 Beneteau Oceanis 3212013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
ManufacturerBeneteauBeneteau
Year1995–20012013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceFrance
DesignerGroupe FinotVPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA9.68 m (31.8 ft)10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL8.45 m (27.7 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.27 m (10.7 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.5 m² (479 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths62
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
17.37
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
35.71
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
0.81
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321
17.12
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 is a 1990s design by Beneteau from France, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 was penned by Groupe Finot. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 measures 9.68m (31.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.27m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is 0.42m longer than the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321. The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 displaces approximately 22% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.37 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 35.7% for the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 120L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1995 Beneteau Oceanis 321 · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3