Catalina 34 MkII vs 1994 Sabre 362 — Comparison

Catalina 34 MkII
VS
1994 Sabre 362

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 34 MkII1994 Sabre 362
General
ManufacturerCatalinaSabre
Year1995–20041994–2001
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL9.14 m (30.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.75 m (5.7 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)6,124 kg (13,501 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)2,540 kg (5,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)54.0 m² (581 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 34 MkII
17.08
1994 Sabre 362
16.39
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 34 MkII
37.50
1994 Sabre 362
41.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 34 MkII
0.77
1994 Sabre 362
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 34 MkII
18.13
1994 Sabre 362
18.79

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 34 MkII and 1994 Sabre 362 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 34 MkII is a 1990s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1994 Sabre 362 is a 1990s offering from Sabre from USA. The Catalina 34 MkII was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1994 Sabre 362 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the Catalina 34 MkII measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1994 Sabre 362 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1994 Sabre 362 is 0.61m longer than the Catalina 34 MkII. The 1994 Sabre 362 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 34 MkII has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.08 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1994 Sabre 362, with an SA/D of 16.39 and 54.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 34 MkII has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 34 MkII offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1994 Sabre 362 has a comfort ratio of 18.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the Catalina 34 MkII and 41.5% for the 1994 Sabre 362, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 34 MkII provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1994 Sabre 362 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1994 Sabre 362 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 34 MkII has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 34 MkII · 1994 Sabre 362