1995 Feeling 39 vs 1975 Cal 29 — Comparison

1995 Feeling 39
VS
1975 Cal 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1995 Feeling 391975 Cal 29
General
ManufacturerFeelingCal
Year1995–20031975–1981
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerPhilippe HarléBill Lapworth
Dimensions
LOA11.80 m (38.7 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL10.06 m (33.0 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam3.78 m (12.4 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area66.0 m² (710 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity120 L (31.7 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths75
Cabins31

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
1975 Cal 29
15.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
1975 Cal 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
1975 Cal 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1995 Feeling 39
18.21
1975 Cal 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1995 Feeling 39 and 1975 Cal 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s design by Feeling from France, while the 1975 Cal 29 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The 1995 Feeling 39 was penned by Philippe Harlé. The 1975 Cal 29 was designed by Bill Lapworth.

In terms of size, the 1995 Feeling 39 measures 11.80m (38.7ft) overall with a beam of 3.78m, compared to the 1975 Cal 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1995 Feeling 39 is 2.96m longer than the 1975 Cal 29. The 1995 Feeling 39 displaces approximately 146% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1995 Feeling 39 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of sail area. The 1975 Cal 29, with an SA/D of 15.99 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1995 Feeling 39 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1995 Feeling 39 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1975 Cal 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39 and 42.9% for the 1975 Cal 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1995 Feeling 39 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 120L of fuel. The 1975 Cal 29 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 Cal 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Feeling 39 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1995 Feeling 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1995 Feeling 39 · 1975 Cal 29