1995 J/80 vs 1986 Island Packet 27 — Comparison

1995 J/80
VS
1986 Island Packet 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1995 J/801986 Island Packet 27
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsIsland Packet
Year19951986–1994
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRod JohnstoneBob Johnson
Dimensions
LOA8.00 m (26.2 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam2.50 m (8.2 ft)2.90 m (9.5 ft)
Draft1.49 m (4.9 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement1,360 kg (2,998 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast499 kg (1,100 lbs)1,270 kg (2,800 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area32.0 m² (344 ft²)29.0 m² (312 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths24
Cabins1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1995 J/80
26.50
1986 Island Packet 27
13.64
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1995 J/80
36.69
1986 Island Packet 27
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1995 J/80
0.90
1986 Island Packet 27
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1995 J/80
11.55
1986 Island Packet 27
21.72

Detailed Comparison

The 1995 J/80 and 1986 Island Packet 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1995 J/80 is a 1990s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1986 Island Packet 27 is a 1980s offering from Island Packet from USA. The 1995 J/80 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 1986 Island Packet 27 was designed by Bob Johnson.

In terms of size, the 1995 J/80 measures 8.00m (26.2ft) overall with a beam of 2.50m, compared to the 1986 Island Packet 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.90m beam. The 1986 Island Packet 27 is 0.23m longer than the 1995 J/80. The 1986 Island Packet 27 displaces approximately 133% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1995 J/80 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 26.50 and 32.0 m² of sail area. The 1986 Island Packet 27, with an SA/D of 13.64 and 29.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1995 J/80 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1995 J/80 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 11.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.90). The 1986 Island Packet 27 has a comfort ratio of 21.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 36.7% for the 1995 J/80 and 40.0% for the 1986 Island Packet 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1995 J/80 provides 2 berths with unspecified water tankage and unspecified fuel capacity. The 1986 Island Packet 27 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Island Packet 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 J/80 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1986 Island Packet 27 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1995 J/80 · 1986 Island Packet 27