Dufour 36 Classic vs 1992 Moody 41 — Comparison
1992 Moody 41
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Dufour 36 Classic | 1992 Moody 41 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Dufour | Moody |
| Year | 1996–2003 | 1992–1998 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | France | UK |
| Designer | Umberto Felci | Bill Dixon |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.90 m (35.8 ft) | 12.50 m (41.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.60 m (31.5 ft) | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.50 m (11.5 ft) | 3.86 m (12.7 ft) |
| Draft | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) | 1.70 m (5.6 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 6,200 kg (13,669 lbs) | 9,800 kg (21,605 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,000 kg (4,409 lbs) | 3,800 kg (8,378 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 57.0 m² (614 ft²) | 70.0 m² (754 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 27 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 110 L (29.1 gal) | 180 L (47.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 200 L (52.8 gal) | 360 L (95.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Dufour 36 Classic and 1992 Moody 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Dufour 36 Classic is a 1990s design by Dufour from France, while the 1992 Moody 41 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The Dufour 36 Classic was penned by Umberto Felci. The 1992 Moody 41 was designed by Bill Dixon.
In terms of size, the Dufour 36 Classic measures 10.90m (35.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.50m, compared to the 1992 Moody 41 at 12.50m (41.0ft) with a 3.86m beam. The 1992 Moody 41 is 1.60m longer than the Dufour 36 Classic. The 1992 Moody 41 displaces approximately 58% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Dufour 36 Classic has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.16 and 57.0 m² of sail area. The 1992 Moody 41, with an SA/D of 15.53 and 70.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Dufour 36 Classic has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Dufour 36 Classic offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1992 Moody 41 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 32.3% for the Dufour 36 Classic and 38.8% for the 1992 Moody 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Dufour 36 Classic provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 110L of fuel. The 1992 Moody 41 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 360L water and 180L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1992 Moody 41 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Dufour 36 Classic has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1992 Moody 41 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Dufour 36 Classic · 1992 Moody 41