Dufour 36 Classic vs 1996 Najad 380 — Comparison

Dufour 36 Classic
VS
1996 Najad 380

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationDufour 36 Classic1996 Najad 380
General
ManufacturerDufourNajad
Year1996–20031996–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceSweden
DesignerUmberto FelciJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA10.90 m (35.8 ft)11.55 m (37.9 ft)
LWL9.60 m (31.5 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
Beam3.50 m (11.5 ft)3.55 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.85 m (6.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,200 kg (13,669 lbs)7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)
Ballast2,000 kg (4,409 lbs)3,050 kg (6,724 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area57.0 m² (614 ft²)62.0 m² (667 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine27 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity110 L (29.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)260 L (68.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Dufour 36 Classic
17.16
1996 Najad 380
16.44
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Dufour 36 Classic
32.26
1996 Najad 380
40.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Dufour 36 Classic
0.76
1996 Najad 380
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Dufour 36 Classic
17.99
1996 Najad 380
20.83

Detailed Comparison

The Dufour 36 Classic and 1996 Najad 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Dufour 36 Classic is a 1990s design by Dufour from France, while the 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s offering from Najad from Sweden. The Dufour 36 Classic was penned by Umberto Felci. The 1996 Najad 380 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the Dufour 36 Classic measures 10.90m (35.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.50m, compared to the 1996 Najad 380 at 11.55m (37.9ft) with a 3.55m beam. The 1996 Najad 380 is 0.65m longer than the Dufour 36 Classic. The 1996 Najad 380 displaces approximately 21% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Dufour 36 Classic has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.16 and 57.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 Najad 380, with an SA/D of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Dufour 36 Classic has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Dufour 36 Classic offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1996 Najad 380 has a comfort ratio of 20.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 32.3% for the Dufour 36 Classic and 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Dufour 36 Classic provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 110L of fuel. The 1996 Najad 380 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L water and 150L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1996 Najad 380 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Dufour 36 Classic has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Dufour 36 Classic · 1996 Najad 380